THE CHAIR: The Society will come to order. Greetings fellow Fullosians on the occasion of The Dean's Speech which will keynote the Society's work in the upcoming Fullosophical year which begins next spring with the vernal equinox. The Dean's speech is rendered shortly after the Solstice in anticipation of the Society's Fullosophical studies beginning at the Equinox. The Society, having abandoned the civic, political and religious holidays of the secular state, observes the equinoxes and the solstices as its natural markers of time. Salve Fullosia!

The Mentor: Point of Order, Lord Chair, I had requested time to address the Society.

THE CHAIR: It does seem unavoidable Mentor.

The Mentor: I wish to call to the attention of The Society that through Mentorials published in Fullosia Press, an old friend from High School was able to connect with me.

THE CHAIR: Thank you for the complement Lord Mentor. I'm sure the Dean is glad that through the good offices of Fullosia Press, the Mentor has ben contacted by former classmates. Now, if I could proceed with the festivities of the evening: The Dean's Speech.

The Mentor: I have not concluded, Lord Chair.

THE CHAIR: Mentor pray be brief.

The Mentor: Lord Chair, I must indeed protest the Dean's decision not to discuss political views with the Mentor and his refusal to include the Mentor's political views when the Dean strings isolated Mentorial audiogrammes into a coherent Mentorial for publication in Fullosia Press.

THE CHAIR: You are free to write your own material for your Mentorial instead of relying on the Dean to collect disjoined and often wordy, lengthy and duplicative audiogrammes and polish Mentor's oratory renditions into a readable Mentorial.

The Mentor: But Lord Chair, what of the Society's longstanding policy of being an open forum? Has the Dean discarded it?

THE CHAIR: Dean?

The Dean: To avoid unnecessary conflict and to avoid giving insult, I have declined to discuss politics including the current Roman pontiff with the Mentor and others of his mindset. In addition, while Fullosia Press remains open to all viewpoints, the Dean will not for reasons stated, avoiding strife and insultation, assist the mentor propagating leftist propaganda.

THE CHAIR: The Society has always stopped short of labelling the Mentor one of those people the Government hires to spread propaganda.

The Dean: Notwithstanding, it is my belief that the poles are so far apart that only a civil war can resolve the abyss that has grown. There is no reason to give personal affront.

THE CHAIR: I believe at this point we are getting into the subject matter of the Dean's speech. Dean, you may proceed.

The Mentor: But Lord Chair I do wish to address other matters: health, nutrition, natural medicine and other matters I like to speak of. I had thought the Dean was interested in the same. I come to learn he regards Natural Medicine as blither recommending to me THE ROAD TO WELLVILLE, a puerile comedy making light of the theories of Dr John Kellogg.

THE CHAIR: Dr Kellogg had unusual uses of Corn Flakes, on a level with Bubba Bill's non - cancerous uses of cigars. The Dean has recommended that the Mentor study Natural Medicine. Perhaps you should follow his recommendation. As you have resisted his proposal, I believe you can bring a mentor to knowledge but can't make him learn. Dean you may proceed.

The Mentor: But Lord Chair, I had done intensive research into the influence of the Second Great Awakening on American Health and Medicine that influenced many protestant denominations, 7th day Adventists, The Mormons, and the Jehovah Witnesses. In Dr Kellogg case, his association with the 7th day Adventists inspired much of his theories.

THE CHAIR: Mentor, American Medicine of Dr Kellogg's era, the Victorian age, was decidedly unscientific perhaps so infected with Victorian prudishness, faith healing, and Patent Medicine hucksterism that US medicine fell below the level of Shamanism.

The Mentor: But Lord Chair, I have read Dr Kellogg's writings. His knowledge of anatomy was thorough. If his use of unusual procedures such as the coffee enema was bizarre and probably of no value, the procedures were not harmful. But to make a joke of him and his theories is sacrilegious. Why couldn't his estate sue the producers for libel?

THE CHAIR: After consulting with the Society's legal advisor, I am informed that a deceased person has no interest in his good name. Is there anything else?

The Mentor: As I understand the story line of THE ROAD TO WELLVILLE, the main character attempts to steal Dr Kellogg's ideas for making breakfast cereals in collaboration with Dr Kellogg's cousin. In fact, Kellogg's ideas were stolen closer to home by Dr Kellogg's own brother who added sugar to the product to make it more palatable though less salubrious and by a patient who created a rival company.

THE CHAIR: I cannot account why a writer alters the truth for reasons of presenting a dramatic theme or simplifying the narrative. It is beyond the subject of the discussion except to refer the Mentor to the Society's own teachings the profit principle. Various of Dr Kellogg's procedures particularly the enemas administered to the small elite who could afford a stay in Dr Kellogg's spa and who should have known better present humorous aspects. Dean, perhaps you could comment.

The Dean: And the world goes round and round. In a sense, the more recent story about the foreign oncologist who was building a castle in Lebanon upon profits made by treating cancer - free patients, over - prescribing toxic drugs and over - billing Medicaid and Medicare. The doctor had a survival rate that was enviable, because he was making patients sick who came to him healthy. For a cut, local Doctors, according to American Greed, simply extended sweaty palms to receive a forwarding fee for referring their relatives to the foreign charlatan. After all the people damaged by this foreign trash have gone, aspects of the story might be humorous: the credulous of people dealing with doctors, the codling of foreignors, their unwarranted advancement to high places, the wiliness of irascible, thieving foreign doctors, the abysmal corruption of the US medical establishment and the unwillingness of the US government to enforce the law until someone important gets hurt.

The Mentor: But Lord Chair, White Americans have been guilty of fraud. I would like to point out that an American doctor who has written a book outlining the problems in US medicine controlled by the power of the purse of the insurers which negotiate rates so low that doctors must impose exorbitant rates on private patients himself will not see private paying patients without charging an excessive fee and providing extensive documentation of identity. He has even written a book on this subject.

THE CHAIR: You have described white liberal hypocrisy, Mentor.

The Mentor: But Lord Chair, I wish to return to the days when you could simply go down the street and pick a doctor without all this unnecessary intrusion into your private life.

THE CHAIR: The Dean, did you wish to add something here.

The Dean: The Mentor supports all the social welfare legislation that mandates the careful examination of a patient's bona fides. The doctor of today must be concerned that a person such as our mentor is working undercover for some agency to see, if the doctor is complying with the myriad of regulations concerning record keeping and billing. The doctor - patient relationship is anything but private today. The Mentor's problem is that he isn't high enough on the Totem pole to be exempt from what he regards as an indignity of the welfare state he espouses.

The Mentor: But Lord Chair, I can look into the hole from which my Totem pole was hewn.

THE CHAIR: Dean, I think you are starting to get into the substance of the Dean's presentation. Dean do you have a comment?

The Dean: The Mentor defines himself by his own standards, truly a mark of individualism, something this Society promotes. However, the social welfare programmes the Mentor espouses define people in relationship to each other. Thus, the Mentor, though he might like to think otherwise, is thrown in with others who have no rights that the government is willing to recognize.

THE CHAIR: Let me close this excessive introduction with my remarks on the foreign problem. The foreign problem is different from any problem we have with other Americans. A foreignor, particularly an Arab or other Islamic is not an American and can never be an American. They are inherently untrustworthy. Mentor, I've indulged you long enough. Now we can hear from the Dean.

The Dean: Greetings Lord President, Lord Chair, our Lord Mentor, distinguished Gentlemen and Members of the Society, the Society lies at the intersection of the universal and the empty set. Today as the country careens toward a civil war, we note that the division between real Americans and Democrats is far greater than that which occasioned the rift of April 1861 and April 1775. In both prior collisions of different world views, there was a commonality that is simply lacking today. In 1861, most Americans North and South agreed on most things. Hotheads in both camps pushed people in two different directions. Similarly, in 1775, Americans and the British shared a common belief system. Miscalculations led differences into a violent breach. Today there are no common beliefs, no common interests, no points of contact, a total separation. And the breach starts at right "in the beginning" in Genesis chapter 5 v 2: "He created them male and female, and He blessed them and named them Man in the day when they were created." The Bible which Christians accept as the revealed word of God says that there are two genders. On the left, there are many genders, as many as 30, maybe more.

The Mentor: Lord Chair, point of order. 30 breaks down into three prime numbers, 2, 3 and 5. Thus shouldn't the Dean accuse the left of having 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, or some other exponential value of 2 so that we could preserve the pair bond?

THE CHAIR: Out of order, Mentor. Dean, proceed.

The Dean: If we are willing to abolish the concept of joining man and woman, why would a pair bond be preserved?

The Mentor: But that is a separate issue entirely.

THE CHAIR: Out of order Mentor. The Dean has the floor. If you have a point of order, you must address the Chair.

The Dean: If the concept, the first point of contention between right and left, that a pair bond is between a man and woman must be overthrown, then why need a bond be limited to two persons? If the left is reconstructing the sexes, why would it be necessary that a bond be forged along an exponential factor of two.

Assuming that the left has identified 30 genders, could not a bond extend beyond two persons to three, four or even five? In such a system we could have one binary grouping, along with a triad or troika and a pentamorpho.

If it is not as written in Holy Writ, then there is no necessary requirement of a pair as opposed to a triad or pentagonical relationship. Did not this Society conceive this very concept if not in jest in the days of the Bush? In such times, with the special relationship between the Bush and Tony Blair, the society recommended that they wed even though both were also married to women. We could have celebrated a new entity, a line marriage incorporating Adam and Steve along with Eve and Evita into a quadrieme!

The matters of respect, for the country, the flag, the language, the American people, the American motherland, and the heritage pale in comparison. With the vicious assault on the monuments throughout the Southland, we see the left has no respect for any of it. The White Liberal is obviously unfit to stand in the shadow of any statue Confederate or Unionist. The White Liberals lack the strength and the courage of conviction to pull the weeds from the bases of these memorials.

Yet, the White Liberal is on a collision course with self - destruction. They are coddling a vicious and alien presence, revanchist in outlook, one which rarely forgives never forgets and always gets even, one with a long memory and of far greater intelligence and learning than many an American especially a White Liberal who seems to have forgotten which side these people were on in World War II. As much as a thinking American should be concerned about the very presence of these acknowledged enemies, never doubt the enemy's personal courage and determination. The simplistic and self - indulgent US left has forgotten it has 70 years of bombing, bloodshed, invasions and manipulations in the Moyen Est to pay for. The US may forget all that; their enemy has not. What stands between the White Liberal and the 'Long Black Train' ride to oblivion is the man the White Liberal hates the most Donald Trump.

And in that regard please bear in mind these newly found friends of the White Liberal once aligned in World War II with the enemies of freedom.

The question is what should we do? Will we wave good bye when the White Liberal finally realizes there is no gay marriage in Sharia Law or simply look the other way?

It is on that note, I thank you for your attention.

Salve Fullosia!

THE CHAIR: That conclude the Dean's speech. The Society shall rise until it is next called into session.